Barack 'n' Devoid
I cannot even begin to tell you how amused I am with the dilemma posed by Barack's candidacy in the face of the Clintonian juggernaut: if you are a good Hollywood liberal ... who do you vote for?
According to Ariana Huffington (major league Hillary suck-up, author and Democrat blogger) "It's like being married, and suddenly you fall in love. You're a good person, and a loyal person ... you have a history with the Clintons,'' she said. "And you feel like you're cheating.'' At an event held at the Beverly Hilton and organized by Hollywood producers David Geffen, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg of DreamWorks SKG -- all of whom had donated generously to Clinton's Senate campaign as well as to Democratic Party causes and whose event raised approximately $1.3 million for Barack-- you could see all sorts of celeb A-listers and moguls flittering around Barack like moths around a flame.
How this must piss Hillary off!! Think of all those Whitehouse invites, those Lincoln bedroom sleep-overs, kiss-ass parties on the Vineyard ... where did it all go? What happened to the "love?" What love? Remember, this is the Clinton machine here that we are talking about and they have made it "very clear that, in the political world, no dalliances are allowed. There is zero tolerance for that,'' according to Huffington. "It's sheer loyalty versus sheer fear.'' Hillary makes her case through e-mails and constant communications by staffers with major donors: the polls show that Hillary will win and if you give any money to anybody else, you can forget about the inaugural. In short, Hillary remembers -- like all those that have crossed her before and are now pushing up the daisies (look to an earlier post about Clintonian associates who have met their demise before their allotted time). And we are not talking about a generous Democrat supporter who maxes out to each candidate ... she wants absolute loyalty: no money to ANYONE else. And Terry McAuliffe (ex-DNC head and now Clinton campaign chairman) has said that in absolutely clear terms. Think Carthage.
Bill's Whitehouse spokesman, Chris Lehane, said this: "I think history is pretty clear that those folks who are loyal to the Clintons find the loyalty is really reciprocated -- and that is one of the reasons why so many people have stuck with them for so long,'' he said. "They really do respect and appreciate it when someone is loyal, and that manifests itself in many ways ... that is what good politicians do.''
My favorite unrepentant-complete-liberal-moron, Natalie Maines from the Dixie Chicks, was at the Barack event (actually, my fav is Barbra Streisand -- where was she, why wasn't she there?). "Everyone was just getting a feel for the first time,'' she said. "You know, it's early on. And everyone here is obviously supporting him financially by coming to this event ... and sort of hoping he lives up to the expectations.'' Ah, the words of the sage. She of the Grammy Awards bounty who is still blacklisted by her heritage and whom she claims to represent (although the Hollywood liberal media cover up the truth about her "country" support in an effort to portray Red States as swinging to the left). Good. I hope she features large in Barack's campaign ... or do I? Maybe I really wish her on Hillary?
BACK TO DEVOID!!
It is almost too embarrassing to contemplate and I (almost) hesitate to mention: Devoid felt it necessary lease a Cadillac. Oh, I am sorry ... it was his s t a f f e r s that did it. Right. Nixon didn't break into the Watergate, either. But why, oh why, did Devoid need a Cadillac when his predecessor made do with a Crown Vickie? Sure, the CV is a piece of poop on 4 wheels, but if Romney, the arch conservative and representative of money and privilege made do with one as governor, Devoid should not bling it up, especially when he comes to office on a platform of sweeping away the practices and greed of the previous administration.
He is not the President. He looks ridiculous -- a cliche, running into a stereotype. In spite of anything I may think about his politics, I don't think that he deserves that image. He is cultured, articulate, educated and accomplished. I also think of him as a greedy hypocrite, a typical Clintonian "do as I say, don't do as I do" liberal weenie -- like his wife really needs a $72,000 per year appointments secretary. A Pelosi-trooper who no doubt will need a personal jet in keeping with his expanded duties to meet with and visit his constituents in western Mass.
Maybe he DOES deserve that image? The Boston Globe continues to accept Devoid's explanations ... they also accepted Billy Bulger's.
According to Ariana Huffington (major league Hillary suck-up, author and Democrat blogger) "It's like being married, and suddenly you fall in love. You're a good person, and a loyal person ... you have a history with the Clintons,'' she said. "And you feel like you're cheating.'' At an event held at the Beverly Hilton and organized by Hollywood producers David Geffen, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg of DreamWorks SKG -- all of whom had donated generously to Clinton's Senate campaign as well as to Democratic Party causes and whose event raised approximately $1.3 million for Barack-- you could see all sorts of celeb A-listers and moguls flittering around Barack like moths around a flame.
How this must piss Hillary off!! Think of all those Whitehouse invites, those Lincoln bedroom sleep-overs, kiss-ass parties on the Vineyard ... where did it all go? What happened to the "love?" What love? Remember, this is the Clinton machine here that we are talking about and they have made it "very clear that, in the political world, no dalliances are allowed. There is zero tolerance for that,'' according to Huffington. "It's sheer loyalty versus sheer fear.'' Hillary makes her case through e-mails and constant communications by staffers with major donors: the polls show that Hillary will win and if you give any money to anybody else, you can forget about the inaugural. In short, Hillary remembers -- like all those that have crossed her before and are now pushing up the daisies (look to an earlier post about Clintonian associates who have met their demise before their allotted time). And we are not talking about a generous Democrat supporter who maxes out to each candidate ... she wants absolute loyalty: no money to ANYONE else. And Terry McAuliffe (ex-DNC head and now Clinton campaign chairman) has said that in absolutely clear terms. Think Carthage.
Bill's Whitehouse spokesman, Chris Lehane, said this: "I think history is pretty clear that those folks who are loyal to the Clintons find the loyalty is really reciprocated -- and that is one of the reasons why so many people have stuck with them for so long,'' he said. "They really do respect and appreciate it when someone is loyal, and that manifests itself in many ways ... that is what good politicians do.''
My favorite unrepentant-complete-liberal-moron, Natalie Maines from the Dixie Chicks, was at the Barack event (actually, my fav is Barbra Streisand -- where was she, why wasn't she there?). "Everyone was just getting a feel for the first time,'' she said. "You know, it's early on. And everyone here is obviously supporting him financially by coming to this event ... and sort of hoping he lives up to the expectations.'' Ah, the words of the sage. She of the Grammy Awards bounty who is still blacklisted by her heritage and whom she claims to represent (although the Hollywood liberal media cover up the truth about her "country" support in an effort to portray Red States as swinging to the left). Good. I hope she features large in Barack's campaign ... or do I? Maybe I really wish her on Hillary?
BACK TO DEVOID!!
It is almost too embarrassing to contemplate and I (almost) hesitate to mention: Devoid felt it necessary lease a Cadillac. Oh, I am sorry ... it was his s t a f f e r s that did it. Right. Nixon didn't break into the Watergate, either. But why, oh why, did Devoid need a Cadillac when his predecessor made do with a Crown Vickie? Sure, the CV is a piece of poop on 4 wheels, but if Romney, the arch conservative and representative of money and privilege made do with one as governor, Devoid should not bling it up, especially when he comes to office on a platform of sweeping away the practices and greed of the previous administration.
He is not the President. He looks ridiculous -- a cliche, running into a stereotype. In spite of anything I may think about his politics, I don't think that he deserves that image. He is cultured, articulate, educated and accomplished. I also think of him as a greedy hypocrite, a typical Clintonian "do as I say, don't do as I do" liberal weenie -- like his wife really needs a $72,000 per year appointments secretary. A Pelosi-trooper who no doubt will need a personal jet in keeping with his expanded duties to meet with and visit his constituents in western Mass.
Maybe he DOES deserve that image? The Boston Globe continues to accept Devoid's explanations ... they also accepted Billy Bulger's.
posted by Zaphod at Friday, February 23, 2007
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home