Time passes or is that Tibet?
To boycott Beijing or not? Because of China and its inscrutable support of vicious murders in Darfur, we should not go to Beijing to risk our athlete's lungs in the grime and filth of modern-day China. Uh huh. Or is it that we should not subject our prime sportmen and women to high levels of ozone because of China's imperialistic designs on the subjugation of Tibet?
Hang on, I am struggling with orthodoxy here.
The heck with it, let's talk about Hil-liar instead.
Hil-liar and her disbarred, racist husband refuse to bow out. They will drag our sorry behinds all the way to the Democratic convention where they hope to con/shame/buy the votes from the super delegates that they need to run for the White House in November. This is porn to Republicans. Dirty, raw, XXX-rated porn. Frankly, it does not get any better than this (not that I watch "classic" porn)!!! Break out the popcorn, let's see what doozies the Clinton campaign can dig up for the benefit of the McCain campaign in the coming months.
When did "Barry" Obama become "Barack" Obama? Just a random thought ... 'coz he was known as Barry for quite a while in his youth. I suppose that William Jefferson does not sound as good as "Bill," and for those who have lived in the UK, "Barry" does have a faintly Essex-sounding ring to it. Hmm.
The mass-media news cabals have finally caught onto the little twist that Hil-liar has been milking for the past 6 months: she has never liked being identified as a common "woman" -- indeed scorning the idea of the stay-at-home-mom as demeaning, while she was "out changing the world." But then playing to the same crowd as helping them get their turn -- electing a woman as payback for all those slights experienced by womankind everywhere, the lack of respect shown to stay-at-homes, the partial career/family woman, etc. Sort of reminds me of the way the Clintons totally "diss" the black voter, knowing that in the end they will vote Democratic, no matter what. Bill got caught out on that one too.
Nothing in her entire past has shown that Hil-liar has ever intended to represent old-line womanhood: her entire life has been a rejection of that, a classic '60's repudiation of gender lines and roles. Now she wants her gender to line up behind her. Increasingly, women across the country have said, "we feel it's time for a woman President ... just not her." Hopefully, women all over America will wake up in time to realize that she might just jeopardize the chances of meaningful representation in politics by women for a generation. And if the 40-70 age bracket women do desert her, coming to their senses by realizing that this election is about character (as it should be) and not race or gender, Hil-liar will be toast and vulnerable as a Senator in New York, too. Because New Yorkers hate losers.
Hang on, I am struggling with orthodoxy here.
The heck with it, let's talk about Hil-liar instead.
Hil-liar and her disbarred, racist husband refuse to bow out. They will drag our sorry behinds all the way to the Democratic convention where they hope to con/shame/buy the votes from the super delegates that they need to run for the White House in November. This is porn to Republicans. Dirty, raw, XXX-rated porn. Frankly, it does not get any better than this (not that I watch "classic" porn)!!! Break out the popcorn, let's see what doozies the Clinton campaign can dig up for the benefit of the McCain campaign in the coming months.
When did "Barry" Obama become "Barack" Obama? Just a random thought ... 'coz he was known as Barry for quite a while in his youth. I suppose that William Jefferson does not sound as good as "Bill," and for those who have lived in the UK, "Barry" does have a faintly Essex-sounding ring to it. Hmm.
The mass-media news cabals have finally caught onto the little twist that Hil-liar has been milking for the past 6 months: she has never liked being identified as a common "woman" -- indeed scorning the idea of the stay-at-home-mom as demeaning, while she was "out changing the world." But then playing to the same crowd as helping them get their turn -- electing a woman as payback for all those slights experienced by womankind everywhere, the lack of respect shown to stay-at-homes, the partial career/family woman, etc. Sort of reminds me of the way the Clintons totally "diss" the black voter, knowing that in the end they will vote Democratic, no matter what. Bill got caught out on that one too.
Nothing in her entire past has shown that Hil-liar has ever intended to represent old-line womanhood: her entire life has been a rejection of that, a classic '60's repudiation of gender lines and roles. Now she wants her gender to line up behind her. Increasingly, women across the country have said, "we feel it's time for a woman President ... just not her." Hopefully, women all over America will wake up in time to realize that she might just jeopardize the chances of meaningful representation in politics by women for a generation. And if the 40-70 age bracket women do desert her, coming to their senses by realizing that this election is about character (as it should be) and not race or gender, Hil-liar will be toast and vulnerable as a Senator in New York, too. Because New Yorkers hate losers.
Labels: Hillary Barack Tibet hypocrites
posted by Zaphod at Tuesday, April 01, 2008
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home