The media is not being honest ... sorry for being obvious.

About a week ago, now, the National Enquirer said that it had the goods on Obama. Taking down John Edwards is one thing, bringing down the Messiah ... is, well, Pilotesque.  But they would not go to press unless they had something more than a mere rumor, after all, it is the President of the United States we are talking about.

But have you seen one "peep" from main stream media? Remember in the Edwards scandal, they had to all but show the video of the deeds to get the media to follow on the story. And Edwards is a scab compared to the shining host of POTUS Barack.  

Being a confirmed conspiracy theorist, I imagine that every possible Federal Agency has its best men out trying to ferret the story sources and buying off any possible witnesses -- and I would not hesitate for a moment to imagine that the Liberal machine would make such witnesses disappear. Remember Hillary's lawyer friend Vince? Or Ron Brown? Or about 20 Arkansas State Troopers?  And in Chicago they don't mess around by comparison.

Also obvious by the sheer lack of reporting are the violent demonstrations on May Day. Not a peep from ABC / CBS / NBC / MSNBC or any of the leftist America-haters like Olderman and Maddow. But violent the demonstrators were and nobody seems to give a shit. By contrast, had a Tea Party demonstration descended into similar violence, Janet Napolitano would have sent in the National Guard to arrest these foes of democracy.

Instead, the media puts on Antonio Villraigosa, Mayor of Los Angeles. Rather than labor (much) at showing why I am disgusted, I will post a few choice statements by the Mayor:

We have every right to secure our borders in a post September 11 world. But, we need to do so in a rational way, in a way that respects the human rights and the democratic rights of the people in this country, whether they're legal or not. Hmmm do illegals get "democratic rights?"

Look, what we've said is tht a federal responsibility under our U.S. Constitution. It should remain solely within the responsibility and the jurisdiction of the federal government to fix our borders. Yes, but our President doesn't seem to care.
 

[T]he estimates are that it would cost the United States of America more than $280 billion to deport 12 million people.Why? Does that include First Class airfare?


Blasting Arizona's tough new immigration law as "unpatriotic and unconstitutional," Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on Thursday backed a boycott of the state .... An internal U.S. boycott of a State by another? Is he serious?

And then we get the news that the Boston City Council that today decided to boycott Arizona. Who the hell are these guys, anyway? Does Arizona care? More importantly, why should an Eastern Liberal City -- which has declared itself to be an "open city" to all illegals -- have any "say" as to what the citizens of another state choose to do?  And of which 70% support the legislation. New honcho -- Councilor Felix Arroyo -- asks that Boston cancel all contracts with Arizona companies and that no Boston personnel travel to Arizona. Why would Boston personnel travel Arizona when the City is almost destitute? And who says that contracts with Arizona firms are anything to do with people who support that law?  My guess is that Arizona buys and trades more with Boston than the other way around. If not, who cares?

How about all people that respect comity of laws and minding their own damn business boycott Boston? Actually, boycott Federal taxes until Obama chooses to enforce the laws of our land and get some real bipartisan reform enacted?

But then again, who are we kidding: reform will consist of immigration disaster. What a mess.