If we did that...

"A sermon last Friday by a prominent Muslim cleric and Hamas member of the Palestinian parliament openly declared that "the capital of the Catholics, or the Crusader capital," would soon be conquered by Islam.

The fiery sermon, delivered by Yunis al-Astal and aired on Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV, predicted that Rome would become "an advanced post for the Islamic conquests, which will spread though Europe in its entirety, and then will turn to the two Americas, even Eastern Europe."

"Allah has chosen you for Himself and for His religion," al-Astal preached, "so that you will serve as the engine pulling this nation to the phase of succession, security and consolidation of power, and even to conquests through da'wa and military conquests of the capitals of the entire world.

"Very soon, Allah willing, Rome will be conquered, just like Constantinople was, as was prophesized by our prophet Muhammad," he added.

Al-Astal last June preached how it was the duty of Palestinian women to martyr themselves by becoming homicide bombers.

"The most exalted form of jihad is fighting for the sake of Allah, which means sacrificing one's soul by fighting the enemies head-on, even if it leads to martyrdom," he said in a June 23, 2007 interview."

And just imagine if some Western theologian or politician said those words as against Islam ... there would be protests in the streets, crowds of people baying for blood, threats against all infidels. Chaos. "Crusader speech!" "Imperialist venom!" And yet we let these turkeys carry on like this with impunity. We should martyr his ass with a laser guided maverick missile. Assist his miserable tribal butt onwards.

These scum-mullahs actually represent the thought of the people ... this cat is from Hamas. The liberals in this country and EU would have us appease Hamas and engage them in "negotiation," "listen to their point of views, respect them." What are we? Idiots? Would Barack Obugger engage in meaningful dialog with these hate mongers? Of course, a liberal would say I am the hate-monger, and the Muslim cleric is responding to the oppression by me and my ancestors. Bullshit.

Islam has practiced this form of foreign policy since its inception. They got as far as Vienna and rural France in their first attempt. They were not then responding to anything but their internal need for aggression. And nothing has changed much in 1200 years. As I have written before, the U.S. Navy was created in response to ... Islamic warlords preying on American merchant shipping. True. Look it up. Fact is much stranger than fiction. And as Mark Steyn writes in "America Alone," it is demographics and stupid European appeasement that is going to allow Islam to do precisely what this Ham-moron threatens.

Get with the plan: there can be no peace with these people. There can be no accommodation, They do not want to discuss our differences, they want to kill us. For the Greater Glory of Allah -- at least the brands of Islam financed by Saudi Arabia and Tehran do. And from their point of view it makes sense. Their great weapon is not learning, it is breeding -- as in large numbers of cannon fodder. When the oil runs out, and it will, they will need to be in possession of the resources to carry on their form of "civilization" and to do that, they need to get on with pretty darn quickly.

As an aside, you don't see any Mullahs or Clerics strapping explosives to their chests for Allah, do you? Sort of like the kommisars of the GRU behind the Great Red Army in WW2 ... they shot deserters and anyone thought not brave enough in the face of the enemy. But there are no reliable records of companies of "heroic political kommisars" leading the charge into the face of the hated Nazis... Rather, it was "Ivan the steelworker" who led the charge: get shot in the face by a German or shot in the back by the Party. Hell of a choice.

And we get to vote for M(an)c(hurian)Cain, Hil-liar or Obugger.