Mullahtocracy

So, to vast gasps of shock and amazement, Iran tells the UN and Europe to stick their demands up their respective rectums. Oh, wow. I am truly astounded at this.

Right. And George Michael doesn't like dirty sex.

I just cannot fathom how this has been so messed up by the chickenshits in the driving seats of the (so called) E3. Britain, Germany and of course the surrender-monkeys, France, have not the faintest clue. France, in particular are so terrified of arousing the passions of its home-grown psycho-mob has bent over to receive the Santorum dished out by my favorite terrorist, Ahmadinejad, (see above). Would you believe ANYTHING this man said to you? Apparently European governments have fallen over themselves to do precisely that.

Now, the E3, with Condi in tow, have to try and convince the idiots in Moscow and Beijing that they really need to "deal" with this now. Fat chance. The most ironic thing is that the Russian domestic islamo-loonies WOULD use dirty bombs or (mostlikely) low yield nukes on political targets: Moscow and Leningrad. You think the Chechens wouldn't? If so, you haven't been doing your homework. Notwithstanding the miserable performance of the IDF in the latest "war", I am sure that their missiles do work and that the warheads are in fine order. So you tread a little more carefully. But when the dudes that blow up the tactical device in your hometown also share your passport, you are in a different position. Sure the Russians could deduce where the fissile material came from and flatten Tehran, but they are far less likely to do so than Israel given an attack by their respective enemies.

Net, "what the heck are the Ruskies thinking?" Now the Chinese probably just don't care enough, and see greater Islam as not much of a threat. More of a source of oil once the West no longer can count on receiving Middle East crude. Actually suits their strategic hand. And if one of their Islamic groups gets a nuke from Tehran ... their intelligence services are likely competent on their home turf and it will not pose as much of a threat. Plus, if they lose a city or two ... so what? At any rate the threat is diminished with respect to them, so they block meaningful UN action. Better to be a "friend" (read culturally non-imperialistic) to the sources of oil that they desperately need ... to develop to sell more shit to the US. And since they DO already have long term oil-supply contracts with Iran on the books, this should come as no shocker to those following this.

So the possibility of Security Council action is complete garbage. What is new? The only person "shocked" at Iran's petulance was probably Kofi Annan (and the official surrender monkeys at the Elysee Palace). French Foreign Minister Phillippe Douste-Blazy said, "I deplore Iran's unsatisfactory response to the ambitious negotiation proposals which the Six [the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council [EM] the U.S., United Kingdom, France, Russia and China [EM] plus Germany] made to her. I nonetheless remain convinced that priority must still be given to the path of dialogue." And I deplore your lack of testicles. As TIME says, "[s]o the diplomatic strategy calls for the West not to rise to the bait but instead to sound even more reasonable and cool-headed than the Iranians." But sound like that to who? And for what reason? Huh? I challenge you!!! By contrast Iran sound very level-headed: "[t]he Iranian nation will not accept for one moment any bullying, invasion and violation of its rights...," if one accepts that uranium enrichment is a fundamental sovereign right....

Now, US lunatic-lefties are, of course, looking to the US as the villain: says Leslie Gelb of the Council on Foreign relations, "[a]fter Lebanon and with the deteriorating situation in Iraq, the U.S. has almost no leverage over Iran." Ok, since when did the US have leverage on Iran in the first place? And why should Lebanon have had anything at all to do with Iran-US relations ... unless, of course, the left might be admitting that Hezboohaa is just an extension of Iranian foreign policy in the first place (since it is taken for granted that Israel is the 51st state according to the same people)?

And let's not look for other assistance from UN bodies: the IAEA did not find an Iranian enrichment program in the 18 years that it operated before being made public - we certainly cannot count on them to keep tabs on their "peaceful" plans in the future. Sort of like Hans Blix looking for WMDs. He couldn't find his ass with both hands in broad daylight. But it probably did give Shaddup incentive to learn how to hide and move his little stockpile ... of which Bashar Assad is the most likely custodian.

While "dissing" the French, anyone groove to the fact that Chirac had to back up and send some 1600 more troops to Lebanon? It must have just killed him, and I am sure there are US army types in Baghdad chortling into their beer ... and Condi and Dubyah are having a good giggle too.